Nikita Mashtakov vs Karol Filar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve strength: Filar wins 38.97% of second serve points, while Mashtakov achieves 46.84%. Could this give Mashtakov an upper hand?
• Return effectiveness: Filar wins 43.14% on opponent's second serves and 32.21% on first serves, compared to Mashtakov's 44.36% and 31.26%. Who shows better overall return game?
• Under pressure: Breakpoint savings are crucial, with Filar saving 46% of breakpoints and Mashtakov 51.24%. Which player remains calmer under pressure?
• Year-long performance: Filar has a 55.56% match win rate for the year, slightly higher than Mashtakov's 55.36%. Does this hint at equal footing?
• Surface specialties: Filar excels on clay (61% wins), Mashtakov shines on hard surfaces (58% wins). Will surface play a decisive role in the match?
• Tournament level: Both have mostly competed in Futures/ Satellites/ ITF $10K, with Filar winning 57.14% and Mashtakov 56.36%. Are their competitive levels equivalent?
• Opponent rank faced: Filar contended with an average opponent rank of 366.44, while Mashtakov's was 333.68. Does this showcase Mashtakov's tougher matchups?
• Deciding set capability: Filar has a 30% win rate in deciding sets, contrasted with Mashtakov's 38%. Could Mashtakov conclude tightly contested matches more successfully?
• Break point conversion: Filar converts 37.04% of breakpoints, nearly identical to Mashtakov's 36.99%. How critical is this factor for in-game play?

Editorial Prediction (July 8, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Filar and Mashtakov presents an intriguing battle of strengths and strategies. Recent form indicates that Mashtakov's second serve performance grants him a slight edge over Filar, potentially playing a significant role in match dynamics.

Both players show remarkable abilities to withstand pressure situations, though Mashtakov's higher breakpoint savings could prove to be a determining factor as the match advances. While their overall winning percentages for the year are nearly identical, suggesting parity, the quality of opponents Mashtakov has faced hints at a slightly more challenging competitive landscape.

Surface preference could skew in either direction, with neither player’s favored surface being an apparent factor in this encounter. When evaluating deciding sets, Mashtakov once again appears to have a slight advantage, which could be a critical element should the match extend into a close contest.

Given these considerations, Mashtakov seems to possess a moderate edge that may translate into a victory, especially if he effectively harnesses his superior second serve and breakpoint resilience.